|
|
01-07-2009, 12:24 PM
|
#1 |
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bangor!!
Age: 31
Posts: 10,607
  |
Oh thank god. I can't stand Shelton Benjamin and I don't watch ECW so YAY!!! Good to see Swagger on RAW too.
__________________
Tonight could be legen...Wait for it... An' it harm none, do what thy will Hard core chocaholic but I love you all just as much... No, not you, I hate you...
|
|
|
|
01-07-2009, 12:46 PM
|
#2 |
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Toronto
Age: 39
Posts: 7,398
|
I can't stand Benjamin either. So much promise but doesn't deliver in my eyes. He was okay when he was with Haas but since he's been on his own, nothing of note really.
__________________
I'm a bit of a b*llshitter myself but occasionally enjoy listening to an expert. Please carry on. "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." A rose by any other name, is just a pr*ck in a bush. |
|
|
|
01-07-2009, 01:52 PM
|
#3 |
|
He-Man Worship
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Over the very gates to Hell.
Age: 20
Posts: 2,413
|
In a way, ECW didn't exactly get raped in this draft. ECW isn't really supposed to be in competition with Raw/Smackdown, but it's a breeding ground for new stars who are just out of FCW to get their first taste of live wrestling in front of huge crowds on TV. And it's also where the veterans can come in to aid the younger talent to ensure they get the help they need to progress and become WWE's stars of tomorrow.
__________________
Come and join TWOStars... Unless you're scared...
One nation, under Punk. Indivisible. With integrity and sobriety for all! // GamerRAGE.co.uk - Where RAGE IS GOOD. // WEBSITE // FORUM // Has had his arm broken by Charlie Brooker. |
|
|
|
|
01-07-2009, 11:46 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Age: 20
Posts: 11,780
|
Quote:
That is the ECW loss I'd be most worried about. As you say, ECW is supposed to let guys move up after they've spent time in ECW. So while losing Swagger, Bourne and the Harts will suck for ECW the show, it makes sense. But, why on earth would they take Finlay off the show? If they're going to debut new guys again they'd need him even more. |
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2009, 12:53 AM
|
#5 |
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: -
Age: 20
Posts: 1,100
|
I'd presume they took Finlay off the show and this is a spoiler for the next episode
and besides, Regal can do Finlay's job, plus he's much better than Finlay too. |
|
|
|
Tetris
Chopper Challenge
Helicopter
Trampoline Tricks 2
Cell-Out
Railway Line|
02-07-2009, 12:57 AM
|
#6 |
|
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Age: 20
Posts: 11,780
|
I had forgotten about that. Both of those things actually. So you have a point. Or two.
|
|
|
|
|
02-07-2009, 11:55 PM
|
#7 |
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: USA, Kentucky
Posts: 55
 |
I liked the Smackdown and ECW trades, which looks to me to have improved their shows..except I think Finlay should've stayed on ECW...but Raw didn't need any more guys....Bourne should've went to Smackdown as well as Swagger...maybe Henry going to Raw is alright..and the divas moving to me didn't really matter.
__________________
I can sell a sneeze like it damn near killed me. Please come back, HBK! TWO 2008 Quiz League Champ! _____________________________________________ The preceding post was paid for by the New World Order. |
|
|
|
Typing Test |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| ecw, raw, smackdown |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Hybrid Mode
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:28 PM.
Celebrating 10 years online!