Where did they go? - Page 2

**John Hancock** · 10-03-2010, 05:24 PM

Number one in putting on better shows, or number one in doing better business, because, as close as WWE and TNA shows are in their mutual terribleness, TNA has never even begun to get remotely close to WWE from a business stand point.

**Darkstar** · 10-03-2010, 05:25 PM

In fairness though, when comparing each one doing a BIG match/event the WWE utterly destroy TNA.

**John Hancock** · 10-03-2010, 05:35 PM

I personally think that TNA has more entertaining T.V. shows (not better by the way, just more entertaining) whilst WWE has better P.P.V.'s, making it pretty much a tie.

GoldStandard · 10-03-2010, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkstar

In fairness though, when comparing each one doing a BIG match/event the WWE utterly destroy TNA.

I'm probably misreading this, but are you saying that the best TNA matches are nowhere near the quality of the best WWE matches?

**John Hancock** · 10-03-2010, 05:39 PM

I think he's saying more that WWE are better at giving matches that "big deal" feeling, which they undoubtably are.

**Darkstar** · 10-03-2010, 05:41 PM

Exactly J rock. Though given that the important bit of a match is the psychology I'd say WWEs best matches are far ahead of TNAs anyway. MOVEZ do not a match make.

GoldStandard · 10-03-2010, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by John Hancock

I think he's saying more that WWE are better at giving matches that "big deal" feeling, which they undoubtably are.

Yeah I agree with that.
I just thought he was saying that in terms of wrestling quality the TNA best matches were nowhere near the WWE quality, which of course isn't true.

EDIT:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darkstar

Exactly J rock. Though given that the important bit of a match is the psychology I'd say WWEs best matches are far ahead of TNAs anyway. MOVEZ do not a match make.

I disagree with this. I'm surprised you'd say this kinda thing.
You saying that the Samoa Joe v Kurt Angle matches are nowhere near the quality of say Michaels v Undertaker? Thats bull***t.

DC · 10-03-2010, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoldStandard

Yeah I agree with that.
I just thought he was saying that in terms of wrestling quality the TNA best matches were nowhere near the WWE quality, which of course isn't true.

If you take the BEST (Jericho/HBK, Undertaker/HBK, Benoit/Angle, Brock/Angle, etc, etc) matches from WWE and put them against the BEST matches from TNA (Joe v Angle, Wolfe v Angle, AJ v Angle, AJ v Joe v Daniels, etc, etc), then WWE still cakewalk the argument.

**Darkstar** · 10-03-2010, 05:49 PM

Gee great argument Goldstandard.

10-03-2010, 05:24 PM	#11
John Hancock Est. 1987 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: New York City, New York Age: 22 Posts: 9,048	Number one in putting on better shows, or number one in doing better business, because, as close as WWE and TNA shows are in their mutual terribleness, TNA has never even begun to get remotely close to WWE from a business stand point. __________________ Entertainment Forum Leader: Entertainment Forum

10-03-2010, 05:25 PM	#12
Darkstar Senior Moderator Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Yorkshire Age: 29 Posts: 29,098	In fairness though, when comparing each one doing a BIG match/event the WWE utterly destroy TNA. __________________ TWO Senior Mod If you say Jesus backwards it sounds like sausage.

10-03-2010, 05:35 PM	#13
John Hancock Est. 1987 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: New York City, New York Age: 22 Posts: 9,048	I personally think that TNA has more entertaining T.V. shows (not better by the way, just more entertaining) whilst WWE has better P.P.V.'s, making it pretty much a tie. __________________ Entertainment Forum Leader: Entertainment Forum

10-03-2010, 05:39 PM	#15
John Hancock Est. 1987 Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: New York City, New York Age: 22 Posts: 9,048	I think he's saying more that WWE are better at giving matches that "big deal" feeling, which they undoubtably are. __________________ Entertainment Forum Leader: Entertainment Forum

10-03-2010, 05:41 PM	#16
Darkstar Senior Moderator Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Yorkshire Age: 29 Posts: 29,098	Exactly J rock. Though given that the important bit of a match is the psychology I'd say WWEs best matches are far ahead of TNAs anyway. MOVEZ do not a match make. __________________ TWO Senior Mod If you say Jesus backwards it sounds like sausage.

10-03-2010, 05:49 PM	#19
Darkstar Senior Moderator Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Yorkshire Age: 29 Posts: 29,098	Gee great argument Goldstandard. __________________ TWO Senior Mod If you say Jesus backwards it sounds like sausage. Last edited by Darkstar; 10-03-2010 at 06:54 PM.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode