The worst of the worst

[Latino Reheat]

Well, well, well.......

[Skullmonkey]

Man you're choices suck. Where are The Hogantaker, The Crock, and The Boogerman? Not to mention the great tag team of Ironic (That we ever had jobs.)

[Latino Reheat]

hogantaker - two people you didnt seperate or just one?
Booger man? I know who the crock is.

[Ro*]

I won't be voting...its so hard to choose.

[Latino Reheat]

But you did, didn't you?

[Skullmonkey]

Hogantaker is one guy. (non-selling Taker) Boogerman is obvious.

[Latino Reheat]

I can't edit the poll. ahwell i'll do another one soon.

Yeah the boogerman.......is........obvious, yes.......who is it again? ;)

[Cactus Jack]

Bastion Booger?

[Latino Reheat]

Nice music, ugly mug.

Well deserved place on Wrestlecrap.com (R.I.P)

[Pabster]

KroniK, KroniK and Kronik deserve to be on that list alongside X-Pac!!

:)

[Latino Reheat]

Luckily their gone, didn't last long did they? Just like Buff Bagwell.

[Sasuke]

Hey don't diss da book, he definately doesn't deserve to be in the 'worst of the worst' category. Geez, I know a lot of people don't like him and he screws up a lot of moves BUT I still don't think Jeff Hardy deserves to be there either.

*Runs for cover*

[Latino Reheat]

*Bullets richochet off the walls*

[Miss T]

Buff is definately the worst

[Simon]

Has to be that scrawny piece of crap Jeff Hardy....if RVD is repetetive what the hell is he with his disgusting physique.

I think the choices were alright, theyre all pretty much hated enough to warrant the title of "the worst".

[Jazzmaster]

Definetly Bagwell. I don't think Jeff should be there, I know he's getting repetitive but I respect what he's done in the past. Intereseting that no-one has voted for Big show yet... but then he ain't nearly as bad as Buff.

[suplex king]

i voted for bagwell, even though nash should be on that list, oh yes!!!!

[Seabass]

*WARNING - some parts may contain traces of sarcasm*

what the hell...you put X-pac on the list, this greasy hippie has done much more then the rock and austin AND kurt angle... combined, he was the best european champ ever (apart from d'lo brown), he made DX the best faction in wrestling history- Yes! even better then the NWO or the four horsemen...arrrrrrr hell, if he wasn't in DX then WCW would still be kicking the WWF's ass. he's gimmick never seem to get tired, he always improving on his wrestling skill and the crowd love him telling the critics "X-pac dosen't suck" and his latest accplishment has been that he has saved nWo being a flop and made them look like the most Wntermediating faction in history. i mean...you didn't even see x-pac joining nWo it coming
anyway, i ask...ney, I demand you that you take X-pac off the list, otherwise we will be force to take action, here's a crotch chop as a warning- X

[now who should i vote.....]

[Pabster]

This thread is 7 months old! Why bring it back now??

[sam bird]

It's so easy to negatively critisise is'nt?True,some workers are better than others and seemingly put more effort into performing than others,but whether you like it or not,ANY wrestler deserves respect for getting in the ring on a regular basis and doing a high-risk job,
Later

[Seabass]

yeah but face it, if we didn't criticise, then someof these posts wouldn'r be that fun to read or talk about

[sam bird]

Yeah,thats true but as long as people remember what I said and talk a little more positively sometimes,then that'll be alright,
Later

[Simon]

Err....if someone sucks at their job, then they should be criticised right? They arent doing it for free you know. If they suck and the people dont enjoy watching them, then its what they deserve.

Getting paid to be put through a table is their choice after all.

[sam bird]

Yeah,it's their choice,but thats not the point.The point is you should'nt criticise certain people a lot of the time who work in a high-risk job which is meant to entertain above all else.Stop complaining and just enjoy pro wrestling,yeah there maybe people you don't like,but there's more people you do like,so just enjoy them,if not,don't watch it:rollIt's a little hypocritical dont ya think to come to a board claiming to be a pro wrestling 'fan' and start threads negatively criticising people as if they could do a better job or something,
Later

[Simon]

So we should just sit and say nothing about wrestlers who are crap at their job or who arent entertaining?

I am a pro wrestling fan yeh, which is why I dont like to have to sit and watch crap which a few wrestlers can produce. I'm sorry but I reserve the right to criticise Jeff Hardy or Buff Bawbag....so should everyone else! :P

[Seabass]

i'm a sports entertainment fan- i have the right to criticise wrestlers for not entertaining me

if i was a pro wrestling fan- i would have the right to critices wrestlers for not being a good wrestler

[sam bird]

Yeah,you can criticise certain wrestlers,as long as you respect them for performing in a high-risk job.The fact is,is that the people who do the criticising could'nt do a better job than the one(s) they're criticising,therefore no matter how much they don't like them,they should respect them,
Later

[Seabass]

Originally posted by sam bird
Yeah,you can criticise certain wrestlers,as long as you respect them for performing in a high-risk job.The fact is,is that the people who do the criticising could'nt do a better job than the one(s) they're criticising,therefore no matter how much they don't like them,they should respect them,
Later

that's cool-

[Jerichoholic]

My vote goes to X-Pac, he's only in nWo to make up numbers!!

[RazorRoss]

If there was no criticism of wrestlers, there would be no competition and X-Pac would be the WWE undisputed champion...........Sure, I can't wrestle myself, but I don't choose to-unlike those in this poll, as well as others that aren't included..we pay money to watch these people perform and desevre to see a good performance, and therefore have every right to complain and criticise when we're not entertained.

[sam bird]

You don't have the right to criticise every time you're not being entertained,because wrestler's can't perform well ALL the time you know:roll.Criticise all you want,but as long as you have a damn good reason and respect the ones your criticising,

[RazorRoss]

What is it with you and trying to get at me Sam Bird??.....I have respect for all those people I criticise-even Stone Cold Steve Austin, as much as I hate him-he might not be able to take powerbombs, but I still wouldn't have the guts to take the bumps he does...I just don't like Austin's wrestling style, or his promos and talking skills-Why is that such a problem to you??? It's an opinion-u wanna talk about respect, y don't u actually show some and respect my opinion?....
And as far as a damn good reason to complain-if I pay £14 or whatever it is for a ppv, that's reason enough for me to criticise if I'm not entertained.

[Simon]

Razor I wouldnt take it personally, he's just been saying the same thing through the whole thread to every one of us :P

I dont really give a poo what risks they take...If they dont entertain me then it doesnt make a difference. At the end of the day they are paid to take the risks, and if they dont do it well enough then they dont deserve respect really do they.

Strange thing is I've always stuck up for X-Pac :)

[RazorRoss]

I'm taking it pretty personally Simon-have u seen the flaming they've had at me on the Big Brother thread??? All I did, was do the poll, and explain why I voted for Austin-I never said that I don't respect the man....I do not enjoy what Austin does, I do not see him to be a good wrestler or talker-that is my opinion. I know u like Austin and think he is a good wrestler-but noone can tell me who is a good wrestler or not because I, like everyone else, have different tastes, views, opinions and I watch WWE for different reasons than perhaps u or Sam Bird do. If I state that "Austin sucks", that is a declaratory statement that states that, in my opinion, Austin does indeed suck-in saying that, I am not saying that Austin does not entertain anyone-he just doesn't entertain me, or for that matter, any of my friends.If ur opinion differs to mine-it is ur choice and I'm not gunna moan and whine at u just because u don't see things from the same perspective as me, unlike someone who seems to enjoy doing so...
I agree with two of your points Simon-wrestlers are paid to take risks, and should entertain me or I will smark about them, as I have every right to-and I agree with u about X-Pac; I've always thought he was pretty good (the inspiration for RVD?) even if his gimmick has never changed in his entire career-but is that his fault or the writers?

[Pete Richards]

Originally posted by sam bird
Yeah,you can criticise certain wrestlers,as long as you respect them for performing in a high-risk job.The fact is,is that the people who do the criticising could'nt do a better job than the one(s) they're criticising,therefore no matter how much they don't like them,they should respect them,
Later

Given the chance, i think i could do quite well, better than A FEW (remember that) wrestlers do.

[Seabass]

the fact that i manage to do a frog splash in a small class room must mean that i at least as good as some of the wrestlers who do high flying moves

[Jazzmaster]

But Seabass can you table wrestle? it is the ultamite skill to posess.

[Seabass]

whoa whoa, i've only had 4 matches (i'm 2W-0D-2L)...but i'm going to assume i can :D

[sam bird]

You're a sensitive boy aren't you 'Razor'?I was'nt digging at you,I was saying the truth thats all.If you can't take that then thats your problem,not mine.Oh and if you pay whatever for a PPV and aren't entertained,then don't pay again.The fact is:Wrestlers can't perform to a high standard ALL the time,so no you can't criticise a wrestler every time they don't entertain you,because they can't perform excellently all the time.Oh and I'd say you don't have any respect for Austin seen as you say he's got an 'inflated-ego' without even personally knowing him,so I suggest YOU show respect,

[Simon]

I still think we're talking about Wrestlers who dont entertain on a regular basis (ie. Mr. Buff Bagwell).

These are the type of guys who dont deserve respect because theres so many people who would love to get a shot at what they do, and most of these "not entertaining" wrestlers dont respect the opportunities they have in my opinion.

Just think how many of us would love a shot at it (until we take a bump and go ow get me out of here :P )

[RazorRoss]

I suggest YOU show respect
Sorry, are you talking about whether I show respect for Austin?....wait a minute, let's check back to my post....
I voted for Austin-I never said that I don't respect the man
Oh yeah, there it is......
Sam Bird, if you're gunna have a go at me over my posts, please take the time to read them......and like I said before, stop preaching about respect unless your gunna show some yourself and realize that not everybody loves Austin like you might do....I never said everyone hates the guy, I only stated that I myself do...I dislike Austin's style of entertainment-you can like Austin if you want, I'm not gunna stop you-but know this, when you post, your not telling me the truth, nor the facts-you are expressing your opinion.
One last thing.....why do you have this strange obsession with me not knowing Austin?...no I don't know him, I don't particularly want to know him, nor have I ever claimed to know him......what I do know is that although you may have enjoyed his matches with Kurt Angle, Chris Benoit, The Rock etc....but I didn't-you can if you want obviously, but I just don't like Austin-why does that matter to you so much??? If you love him so much, do what you want-start an Austin fan club, do a tribute to him-just stop bothereing me just because I don't see things the same way you do.

[sam bird]

I'm not bothering you,you with your long posts are bothering ME!I read every one of your posts,your the one not listening or reading mine properly e.g I said I was'nt having a dig at you,but you obviously feel I am.Please read before typing,ok?!then you might get your facts straight.I did'nt claim you knew(I was being sarcastic which I pointed out)Austin,but the way you were talking about him(like his got an 'inflated-ego')would only have merit and credibility and sense coming from someone who knows him personally,which you don't,so stop making personal assumptions about people you don't know personally.Unfortunetly for you,what I was saying about Austin WAS fact.Want to know why?He does not suck because of the reasons I've already explained over and over and he does not suck because he is still capable of putting on great matches despite all the injuries he's got and is still over enough to be a main eventer,which takes talent,which suggests he does not suck,end of story.